Converting Civil Partnerships to Marriage? Not so easy.
A gay couple from Barnsley are threatening legal action against the government after discovering they will not be able to marry on 29 March, when the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act comes into force, because they are already in a civil partnership.
Michael and Paul Atwal-Brice entered into a civil partnership in 2008 as marriage was not an option available to same-sex couples at the time.
They planned to become one of the first couples to convert to marriage when the legislation came into force and had chosen their suits and ordered a wedding cake when they were hit with what Paul calls a “legal bombshell”.
When they went to book a registrar for their wedding, they were told they could not marry unless they first formally dissolved their civil partnership – in effect getting a divorce.
The government has not yet decided how same-sex couples can convert their civil partnership to marriage. The process will not be finalised before the end of 2014, a spokeswoman for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) admitted.
It was an “unfortunate anomaly”, said a spokesman from the gay rights group Stonewall, who said the organisation had been lobbying hard on the issue.
Paul, 34, who has twin seven-year-old sons with his partner Michael, 29, said: “We’re being penalised because we’re already in a civil partnership. No couple should be asked to divorce or dissolve to be able to get married. To dissolve a civil partnership, you have to go to court, and you have to have a valid reason. Wanting to get married is hardly a valid reason to dissolve a civil partnership, so we would effectively have had to commit perjury.”
Dissolution of a civil partnership is only possible on grounds of unreasonable behaviour, two years’ desertion, two year’s separation (with the respondent’s consent), or five years’ separation (without consent).
“For us this is about equality,” said Paul. “But it’s not just the principle of the situation – there are legal and practical difficulties if we were forced to divorce. If our civil partnership were dissolved there would be a period of time when we would not be each other’s next of kin, for example.”
The men want to raise awareness of the problem, believing that many other couples may unknowingly be in the same situation.
Now the couple have instructed lawyers after being told that because of delays in implementing parts of the act, they would have to get a formal dissolution before they can marry.
Their solicitors Irwin Mitchell have written to the culture secretary, Maria Miller, warning of potential judicial review action if the issue is not resolved satisfactorily.
Irwin Mitchell believes there are breaches of British equality and human rights law, and that the government has failed to take into account all relevant considerations when creating the equal marriage laws.
Zoe Round, a specialist family lawyer at Irwin Mitchell solicitors in Sheffield, said: “Our clients are naturally devastated at the prospect of having to go through a formal dissolution before they can get married. They had been waiting for this legislation to be agreed for years and now, at the final hurdle, are finding that the process just doesn’t seem to have been thought through.
“All necessary considerations should have been taken into account by the government before the announcement was made that the first same-sex marriages could happen from 29 March 2014.
“We have written to the government to ask them to implement the process of conversion from a civil partnership to a same-sex marriage as was intended by parliament in section 9 of the act, so that couples that want to marry don’t have to go through a dissolution of their civil partnership before their ceremony.
“Why should they be forced to get a dissolution just to remarry? It seems absurd and we are supporting them in their fight to remedy the situation. If the issue cannot be resolved then we may have no choice but to seek a judicial review in the high court.”
A DCMS spokeswoman said: “We are continuing to work hard to ensure that couples wanting to convert their civil partnerships into marriages are able to do so as soon as possible. We aim to do this before the end of 2014.
“It will take a little longer because we need to introduce completely new procedures and processes. This contrasts with the work to make new marriages for same-sex couples possible, where we have been able to build on existing processes so implementation is more straightforward.
“The conversion process will ensure that couples in civil partnerships do not have a break in their legal relationship, which could have implications for matters such as their pension entitlements.”
This is what happens when you rush through legislation without thinking about it. Those already in a Civil Partnership will not be able to conduct a same-sex marriage for some time yet.
forgive me for giving the impression on another thread that this was decided –
fill in the form and send of the 65 quid …….
That was what I was told in the lobby of the House of Lords and I took it as a done deal.
i was also told that the marriage would be backdated to the date our civil partnership began …..
You see, I always was married, I just didn’t know it ……..
I fail to see how difficult it is – just allow any couple with a CP to come to a Registry, swear vows and be declared married. At the point the marriage is contracted the CP ceases to exist, but the marriage is assumed to have existed since the start of the CP. How hard is that?
A development we would be glad to see.
Though the venue might be different ………
But we were told there would be no ceremony to mark this conversion ………
At least it now seems that it is not all decided ……
Ah! I have just read the government’s consultation document on Civil Partnerships ………. I think the story of how complicated it is to convert CPs to marriage is a theme of that paper and so that is why we have the agonies and delay.
How have such smart people botched this so comprehensively….?!
This is what happens when people try to put asunder what God has ordained.
Erm, no, this is what happens when politicians don’t use their brains.
I agree. The floods are a better candidate…